"What works. . ."
| Fabrice Aubert | ||
| The problem with the long and tedious vocabulary lists
which we usually give to our students is well known: they learn loads
of new words by heart only to get a good grade in tests and then forget
them. Why? Because these words don't mean much to them apart from
the (painful) job of short-term memorization.
With (pre-)intermediate up to advanced students, I believe there is another way. Students take turns as scribes and write down some of the new words that the teacher (or the students) use during the courses. When you discuss literature, a picture, or any given topic, the only thing you have to do is save a fraction of the blackboard (or OHP) for the words you want to see on the scribes' lists (I actually advise you to have two scribes at a time and to provide them with a diskette). After correcting the list(s), hand it (them) out to the rest of the class. They're more likely to learn and remember these new words in this way because they are a testimony of their share in the life of the class. |
||
|
|
||
| Christian Broye | ||
|
|
||
| Anne Buffle | ||
|
|
||
| Gisele Comte | ||
|
|
||
| Isabelle Connolly | ||
|
|
||
| Raphael Daniel | ||
|
|
||
| Nicolas Fleury | ||
|
|
||
| Heide Hofbauer | ||
| Some activities which seem to work well in my classes
are the following:
1) pairwork 2) oral interrogations in class (among the students) using structures such as: "Find out if. . ." 3)brain maps - leading to oral and written work.
|
||
|
|
||
| Lilliam Hurst | ||
| I think my students appreciate. . .
The use of worksheets making use of lateral thinking to help them approach a literary text. Writing activities with multiple feedback sessions from the teacher, leading to progressively finer tuning of their texts. They also seem to appreciate being able to use the computer lab for the following activities:
|
||
|
|
||
| Joy Kundig | ||
| For some books I prepare question lists that cover the
major aspects of plot, character and theme.
These lists can vary in detail according to the level of reading being
handled and/or the language skills of the class.
Students write directly on the sheets, this way they also have a written record (in English!) that they can refer to in order to revise before tests, exams, etc. Students seem to like this method. It gives a structure and order to the material and they feel that they have done something useful (created something that might be relevant in the future) during classroom time. |
||
|
|
||
| Regula Locher | ||
| Homereading of novels in 4th year linked to sessions
of tutoring before the presentation of some aspects of the chosen novels
in class.
This allows a choice of texts taking into account the language skills and personal interests of the students and the inclusion of works from all over the English-speaking world. The teaching of literature in 3rd and 4th year is bound to be restricted to the study of only a few texts that should reflect diffirent cultural backgrounds and different eras. Seeing that some of the most fascinating recent writing has been done by authors in the former British colonies or by immigrants or descendants of immigrants in Great Britain, one term (sometimes two) out of six are spent on texts that may be labelled as "New Literatures in English" or "Emergent Literatures". |
||
|
|
||
| Claire-Anne Meinich | ||
|
|
||
| Peter Meinich | ||
| What works for me are the exercises I make up according to the needs of the students as they go along and learn new structures. I enjoy inventing them. | ||
|
|
||
| Alain Sigg | ||
|
|
||
| Christiane Stahel | ||
|
|
||
| Monique Tournaire | ||
|
|
||
© Lilliam Hurst, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
Last updated on December 18, 2005